Someone who has both trained a frontier LLM and engineered viruses argues the AI-bioweapon scenario is impractical
David Bellamy posted a six-point rebuttal to the AI-supervirus scenario that is being used to justify this month's slowdown arguments, and it got traction on r/singularity precisely because of his dual background. His claims: viral bioweapon production needs multiple expensive facilities with instruments that were never designed for automation, building such a facility is hard to hide, operating it requires inputs from DNA synthesis and biotech suppliers that sit inside a monitored and legally controlled supply chain, and efficacy cannot be established without human testing that mouse models do not substitute for. This is the most specific technical counter-argument to the bio-risk case I have seen surface in the current cycle, and it is one person's thread, not a paper.
Source
↳ Follow the thread