Fetching from the wire…
Top 5 · 2026-04-29 · source-backed
Poolside AI released two models that change the math on local coding agents. Laguna M.1 is a 225B total / 23B active MoE model scoring 72.5% on SWE-bench Verified. Laguna XS.2 is a 33B total / 3B active model scoring 68.2% on the same benchmark, 44.5% on SWE-bench Pro, and 30.1% on Terminal-Bench 2.0. Both are Apache 2.0. XS.2 runs locally on a Mac with 36GB RAM via Ollama. (Source)
Alongside the models, Poolside shipped "pool," a lightweight terminal-based coding agent that runs entirely on your machine. It's the same environment they use internally for agent RL training, now available as a research preview. Combine pool with XS.2 and you've got a competitive agentic coding setup with zero API costs and zero data leaving your machine.
I want to put this in context. A year ago, getting above 50% on SWE-bench Verified with a local model felt aspirational. Now we've got 68.2% from a model with 3B active parameters. That's significant. Not because it matches Claude or GPT on the hardest problems, but because it crosses a threshold where local inference becomes genuinely useful for a huge chunk of daily coding work.
The timing matters too. With GitHub Copilot moving to usage-based billing (see story #1), the cost of cloud-hosted coding assistance is about to spike. Having a local alternative that clears the 65% SWE-bench line gives developers a real escape valve. Private codebases, air-gapped environments, developers in regions with spotty API access, indie builders watching their API bills. This serves all of them.
The broader pattern is worth noting. SWE-bench Verified has become the universal legibility benchmark for coding models. Every new launch leads with it. Poolside, Devstral, Qwen Coder, NVIDIA Nemotron. SWE-bench is to coding models what ImageNet was to vision. The standardization makes comparison tractable, but I worry it also incentivizes teaching to the test.
If you've got a Mac with 36GB+ RAM, download XS.2 through Ollama and try pool on a real codebase this week. It's free, it's Apache 2.0, and it might change how you think about paying for AI coding tools.
Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.
Alibaba uses Claude / Shared entities / Shared topic / Earlier coverage / Tension
Linked by a graph relationship (Alibaba uses Claude); both cover Bench, GPT, MoE, SWE; overlapping topics (agent, coding, model, swe-bench).
Apple supports Claude / Shared entities / Shared topic / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (Apple supports Claude); both cover Apache, Bench, MoE, Ollama; overlapping topics (agent, apache, local, model).
Alibaba uses Claude / Shared entities / Shared topic / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (Alibaba uses Claude); both cover Apache, GPT, MoE, SWE; overlapping topics (agent, apache, environment, model).
Cursor supports Claude / Shared entities / Shared topic / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (Cursor supports Claude); both cover Bench, GPT, MoE, SWE; overlapping topics (agent, coding, cost, model).
Claude Code benchmarked against GPT / Shared entities / Shared topic / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (Claude Code benchmarked against GPT); both cover Apache, Bench, MoE, Ollama; overlapping topics (agent, local, model).
Qwen benchmarked against Claude / Shared entities / Shared topic / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (Qwen benchmarked against Claude); both cover Bench, MoE, SWE, Terminal; overlapping topics (coding, model, swe-bench).
Claude Code benchmarked against GPT / Shared entities / Shared topic / Earlier coverage / Tension
Linked by a graph relationship (Claude Code benchmarked against GPT); both cover MoE, Ollama, SWE, Verified; overlapping topics (coding, cost, model, swe-bench).
Qwen benchmarked against Claude / Shared entities / Shared topic / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (Qwen benchmarked against Claude); both cover Apache, Bench, MoE, SWE; overlapping topics (active, apache).