Fetching from the wire…
Top 5 · 2026-05-16 · source-backed
The SaaS selloff that started after Anthropic's Claude Cowork announcement in January has now erased approximately $2 trillion from software market capitalization. The IGV software ETF declined 22% relative to the S&P 500. That's worse than the dot-com bust. Worse than the 2008 financial crisis. Worse than the 2022 rate shock.
Forward P/E multiples collapsed from 84.1x (the 2020-2022 peak) to 22.7x. For the first time ever, software trades below the S&P 500's overall multiple. Let that sink in. The market is saying software companies are now less valuable per dollar of earnings than the average company in America.
Why? Per-seat SaaS is being repriced in a world where AI agents replace licensed users. If one engineer can do the work of 20 (Airbnb's claim), that's 19 fewer Jira seats, 19 fewer GitHub licenses, 19 fewer Slack seats. The market isn't being irrational. It's pricing in the math.
But here's the counter-signal: Figma just reported Q1 revenue of $333M growing 46% YoY with net dollar retention at 139%. Varonis grew SaaS ARR 69% to $683M. The companies that are thriving share one trait: they've become infrastructure for AI workflows rather than tools replaced by them. Figma's Make (their AI feature) is used weekly by 60% of large customers. AI credits are driving seat upgrades, not replacing seats.
The lesson is directional. If your product is a seat that an agent can fill, you're in trouble. If your product is a platform that agents need to operate on, you're in the clear. Supabase shipping an MCP plugin this week isn't a coincidence. It's survival strategy.
What builders should do: If you're building SaaS, price for consumption or outcomes, not seats. Futurum's survey shows 43% of enterprise buyers now prefer consumption-based pricing and hybrid models drive 38% higher NRR. If you're an employee at a per-seat SaaS company, look at your product through the lens of "would an AI agent need a license for this?" If yes, start planning your next move.
Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.
Anthropic released MCP / Shared entities / Shared topic / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (Anthropic released MCP); both cover GitHub, MCP, SaaS, Slack; overlapping topics (agent, product).
Claude uses MCP / Shared entities / Shared topic / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (Claude uses MCP); both cover Figma, GitHub, MCP, Supabase; overlapping topics (agent, figma).
Cloudflare supports MCP / Shared entities / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Cloudflare supports MCP); both cover SaaS, Slack, YoY; overlapping topics (agent, market, per-seat, pricing, saas).
Microsoft supports MCP / Shared entities / Shared topic / Earlier coverage / Tension
Linked by a graph relationship (Microsoft supports MCP); both cover SaaS, YoY; overlapping topics (agent, company, pricing, saas, seat).
Anthropic released MCP / Shared entities / Shared topic / Earlier coverage / Tension
Linked by a graph relationship (Anthropic released MCP); both cover Anthropic, SaaS; overlapping topics (company, market, pricing, product, saas).
Cursor uses MCP / Shared entities / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Cursor uses MCP); both cover Anthropic, Figma, MCP, Slack; overlapping topics (agent, figma).
Microsoft supports MCP / Shared entities / Shared topic / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (Microsoft supports MCP); both cover GitHub, SaaS, Slack; overlapping topics (agent, company, product).
Microsoft supports MCP / Shared entities / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (Microsoft supports MCP); both cover GitHub, MCP, SaaS, Slack; picks up the GitHub thread on 2026-08-15.