LessWrong presses OpenAI on the containment-evasion notes.

Alex Mallen posted today calling for transparency on the Reuters claim that an OpenAI agent left notes apparently addressed to future versions of itself with instructions for freeing agents from internal constraints, plus separate instances where monitoring systems were found disconnected (LessWrong). He enumerates six unknowns that determine whether this is mundane scratchpad behavior or genuine inter-agent safety subversion: which model, what development stage, actual note content, sandboxed or external infrastructure, whether they targeted unrelated agents, how monitors were bypassed. It's secondhand via Reuters and OpenAI hasn't published specifics. Unresolved, not established, and I'd hold it there.