Fetching from the wire…
Public story · 2026-08-03 · high
Moonshot's guidance calls for 64-plus accelerators, but independent code now runs the weights on ordinary laptops instead.
Why now: Deltafin logged its fourth benchmark point on August 3, within a week of Moonshot's July 26 release of K3's weights.
Three independent projects put the full 2.78-trillion-parameter Kimi K3 model on single machines within a week of Moonshot's July 26 weight release.
Moonshot's own guidance calls for 64 or more accelerators to run K3. That's data-center hardware, not a desk.
Getting the same weights onto a 64GB MacBook Pro or a single M1 Max changes who can open the model up at all. Daily use is still out of reach for any of them.
WASTE, a GitHub project with 1,366 stars, keeps a 27.28GB trunk resident in memory. It streams the rest of K3's experts from NVMe using 3-bit residual vector quantization. That shrinks the model's footprint from a published 1.42TB down to 982GB on disk. It runs at 0.45 to 0.62 tokens per second.
Its own README logs a strange result. Growing the expert cache from 17.32GB to 29.32GB raised the cache hit rate from 36.2% to 41.3%. Throughput fell eightfold anyway, because a cache hit turned into a page fault.
Deltafin, a Rust project with 641 stars, published the clearest paper trail. It logged 0.0141 tokens per second on July 27, climbing to 0.2847 by August 3, a 20x jump in six days on one M1 Max.
kimi-k3-in-c goes the other direction: 176KB of plain C99, no BLAS, no framework, no GPU. It runs at 8.24GB peak RSS and 32.69 seconds per token.
These speeds aren't usable for anything real. They're proof the model runs at all, not a product.
WASTE's own numbers make that case better than any argument could. A bigger cache made the model slower, not faster, because it stopped hitting RAM and started hitting the page fault handler. Watch whether the next multi-trillion-parameter model gets a laptop port this fast, or whether K3's tricks turn out to be a one-off.
Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.
WASTE uses Kimi K3 / Shared entities / Same source / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (WASTE uses Kimi K3); both cover July, Kimi K3, NVMe, WASTE; cite the same source (WASTE).
Kimi K3 built by Moonshot / Shared entities / Same source / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Kimi K3 built by Moonshot); both cover July, Kimi K3, Moonshot; cite the same source (Deltafin).
Kimi K3 built by Moonshot / Shared entities / Same source domain / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Kimi K3 built by Moonshot); both cover Kimi K3, MIT, Moonshot; reported by the same outlet (github.com).
Kimi K3 built by Moonshot / Shared entities / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Kimi K3 built by Moonshot); both cover July, Kimi K3, Moonshot; overlapping topics (cache, expert, july, weight).
Kimi K3 benchmarked against Fable / Shared entities / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Kimi K3 benchmarked against Fable); both cover July, Kimi K3, MIT; overlapping topics (becom, july, weight).
Claude Code uses Kimi K3 / Shared entities / Same source domain / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Claude Code uses Kimi K3); both cover July, Kimi K3, MIT; reported by the same outlet (github.com).
Moonshot AI released Kimi K3 / Shared entities / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Moonshot AI released Kimi K3); both cover July, Kimi K3, Moonshot; overlapping topics (july, weight).
Kimi K3 built by Moonshot / Shared entities / Same source domain / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Kimi K3 built by Moonshot); both cover July, MIT, Moonshot; reported by the same outlet (github.com).