Fetching from the wire…
Agents2026-08-08 · source-backed
arXiv 2608.05906 keeps a dual-polarity memory of verified corrections and observed dead ends for Text-to-SQL repair: 66.34% to 69.79% on Spider, 47.35% to 48.44% on BIRD. Then the authors say the quiet part: paired analysis supports the Spider gain but is weak on BIRD, MERIT isn't reliably separated from untyped dynamic retrieval on either benchmark, and Reflexion-style memory reaches 51.24% on BIRD at higher cost. Negative-result honesty in an agent-memory paper is rare enough to be worth reading for the methodology alone.
Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.
Shared entities / Same source domain / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Both cover BIRD, Spider, SQL; reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); overlapping topics (benchmark, bird).
Shared entity: Negative / Same source domain / Shared topic / Earlier coverage / Tension
Both cover Negative; reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); overlapping topics (author, benchmark).
Shared entity: Then / Same source domain / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Both cover Then; reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); overlapping topics (agent, cost).
Both cover Then; reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); overlapping topics (agent, memory).
Shared entity: SQL / Same source domain / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Both cover SQL; reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); overlapping topics (agent, memory).
Shared entity: Then / Same source domain / Earlier coverage / Tension
Both cover Then; reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); earlier Then coverage from 2026-08-06.
Both cover Then; reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); earlier Then coverage from 2026-07-26.
Shared entity: Then / Shared topic / Earlier coverage / Tension
Both cover Then; overlapping topics (benchmark, cost); earlier Then coverage from 2026-07-14.