Fetching from the wire…
Security2026-08-13 · source-backed
arXiv 2608.12172 argues agent defenses are broken because they're agent-centric, entrusting enforcement to a nondeterministic component that prompt injection manipulates directly. The proposal imports three networking principles: centralized control with distributed enforcement, capability-based access, and zero-trust least privilege. The authors concede these don't cover appropriateness judgments. Fine. Put the enforcement point in the harness or a gateway anyway.
Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.
Simon Willison released LLM / Same source domain / Shared topic / Tension
Linked by a graph relationship (Simon Willison released LLM); reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); overlapping topics (access, agent).
Simon Willison released LLM / Shared entity: LLM / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Simon Willison released LLM); both cover LLM; overlapping topics (agent, argu).
Simon Willison released LLM / Shared entity: LLM / Earlier coverage / Tension
Linked by a graph relationship (Simon Willison released LLM); both cover LLM; earlier LLM coverage from 2026-07-27.
Linked by a graph relationship (Simon Willison released LLM); both cover LLM; earlier LLM coverage from 2026-06-19.
Linked by a graph relationship (Simon Willison released LLM); both cover LLM; earlier LLM coverage from 2026-06-18.
Simon Willison released LLM / Same source domain / Shared topic
Linked by a graph relationship (Simon Willison released LLM); reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); overlapping topics (access, agent).
Simon Willison released LLM / Shared entity: LLM / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Simon Willison released LLM); both cover LLM; earlier LLM coverage from 2026-07-31.
Linked by a graph relationship (Simon Willison released LLM); both cover LLM; earlier LLM coverage from 2026-06-19.