Fetching from the wire…
Public story · 2026-08-24 · high
He expected GPT-4 to make software businesses up for grabs right away, but three years on he says buyer habit held instead.
Why now: The comments come from an interview published August 24, three years after the GPT-4 launch that set his original expectations.
Sam Altman admitted he got AI's economic disruption wrong, according to comments posted to r/singularity on August 24. He'd expected GPT-4, released in 2023, to put software businesses "up for grabs right away." Three years later, that hasn't happened. The gap matters for software incumbents and investors who priced fast AI disruption into a plan or a valuation. The CEO of the company that built the model meant to cause that disruption now says it's still not on schedule.
"People keep doing the same things, buying from the same company, wanting to use their tools the same way," Altman said. His conclusion: "we've all been too ambitious on timelines."
The top reply on that thread points to Solow's 1987 productivity paradox, the observation that computers showed up everywhere except the productivity statistics. Altman's explanation for AI lines up with it. The capability arrived on schedule, the buying habits didn't.
Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.
Claude Code benchmarked against GPT / Shared entities / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Claude Code benchmarked against GPT); both cover GPT, People; earlier GPT coverage from 2026-05-04.
Claude Code benchmarked against GPT / Shared entity: August / Same source domain / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Claude Code benchmarked against GPT); both cover August; reported by the same outlet (reddit.com).
Claude Code benchmarked against GPT / Shared entity: August / Shared topic / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Claude Code benchmarked against GPT); both cover August; overlapping topics (august, capability).
Claude Code benchmarked against GPT / Shared entity: GPT / Same source domain / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Claude Code benchmarked against GPT); both cover GPT; reported by the same outlet (reddit.com).
Claude Code benchmarked against GPT / Shared entity: People / Same source domain / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (Claude Code benchmarked against GPT); both cover People; reported by the same outlet (reddit.com).
OpenHands uses GPT / Shared entities / Same source domain / Earlier coverage
Linked by a graph relationship (OpenHands uses GPT); both cover August, GPT; reported by the same outlet (reddit.com).
Claude Code benchmarked against GPT / Shared entity: GPT / Earlier coverage / Tension
Linked by a graph relationship (Claude Code benchmarked against GPT); both cover GPT; earlier GPT coverage from 2026-08-20.
GPT competes with Claude / Shared entities / Same source domain / What happened next
Linked by a graph relationship (GPT competes with Claude); both cover August, GPT; reported by the same outlet (reddit.com).