Fetching from the wire…
Public story · 2026-09-20 · high
Former employees say the tool flagged problem gamblers as top targets while a parallel harm-risk model got shelved.
Why now: Tech Times reported on the New York Times investigation on September 20.
DraftKings built a model in 2023 that scores bettors by how much they're expected to lose, according to Tech Times' reporting on a New York Times investigation. The company called the metric "elasticity."
Executives credited AI-driven promotions with a 13% improvement in sportsbook margin in 2025. The model reads play frequency, account balances, and loss-to-wager ratios, then uses that to direct hundreds of millions of dollars in promotional spend. Former employees told the Times its logic surfaced problem gamblers as the most lucrative group to target with those promotions.
DraftKings reportedly built a second model using the same underlying data. That one was meant to score gambling-harm risk. The project got shelved.
DraftKings says it "rejects any implication" that its marketing unfairly targets customers. The reporting doesn't include the company's own account of why the harm-risk model didn't ship.
I've built scoring models. The technical distance between flagging high-value users and flagging users showing addiction markers is close to zero. You're pulling the same features either way. What separates a defensible targeting model from a predatory one is the decision layer sitting on top of the math. Does a flagged user get a bonus offer, or a cooldown prompt. DraftKings built the second model and didn't ship it. That's the fact a regulator asks about first, and it's what turns a PR problem into a legal exposure problem.
Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.
The September 19 piece covers implementation problems experts raise, including the scenario where a sufficiently capable system resists or dismantles the shutdown mechanism (Tech Times reporting on the NYT). It runs directly against Newsom's executive order pushing California...
Privacy-i AIDR inventories every AI agent on a machine, including Hugging Face models running under Ollama or LM Studio, then enforces execution permissions at the OS access-control layer (Tech Times). An admin can grant one agent read access to a project folder while denying...
This is the highest-conviction story in today's set, because four independent sources landed on the same conclusion in the same window. The consensus: prompt injection isn't a patchable bug. It's inherent to how LLMs work. (Tech Times) The mechanism is simple and that's exactl...
Alongside the Seoul office, it signed an MOU with Korea's Ministry of Science and ICT to establish Korean-language model safety evaluations, share cyber-threat intelligence, and extend Claude to ~60 university researchers (Tech Times). It's a direct counter to the US export ba...
The legislation requires large data-center customers to cover the full cost of grid upgrades rather than spreading them across residential ratepayers. The margin is the whole story. Three votes against makes this the least contested AI-adjacent vote of the year, and it follows...
A June 18 Tech Times analysis reports embodied-AI world-model startups have attracted roughly $6B but argues the prevailing thesis, that world models will do for machines what transformers did for language, may not transfer cleanly, because the pre-train/fine-tune/scale recipe...
MindPattern daily
One email a day at 7 AM. Sources and a take on every story. Unsubscribe anytime.