Fetching from the wire…
Public story · 2026-09-14 · high
Anthropic's profitability figure to investors excludes stock-based compensation, a cost critics call far from trivial.
Why now: The Financial Times' report on Anthropic's investor update, corroborated by Reuters, is what put these numbers and the stock-comp critique in front of readers.
Anthropic told shareholders it expects adjusted operating income to stay positive for a second consecutive quarter, according to the Financial Times. The claim arrives as investors weigh what the company is worth. It comes from a business now generating $65 billion in annualized revenue, up from $9 billion at the end of 2025.
Gross margins run above 80% by that measure. The figure excludes revenue shared with distribution partners including Amazon. It also leaves out the cost of training models. Q2 revenue alone passed $11.5 billion, 14 times what it was a year earlier.
The catch showed up fast in a 250-upvote r/singularity thread reacting to the report, corroborated separately by Reuters. Its top comment points out that the adjusted figure strips out stock-based compensation. For a company Anthropic's size, that's a real cost, not a rounding error, and it doesn't show up in the number investors are seeing.
Reporting the flattering metric while leaving out stock comp, revenue splits, and training cost is a familiar move for software companies chasing valuation multiples. None of it makes the revenue growth fake. Anthropic's business is expanding fast by any measure. But "profitable" and "profitable before stock comp, distribution costs, and training spend" are different claims, and only one of them is what most readers hear. Watch for whether Anthropic ever reports the unadjusted number on its own, or whether it only surfaces later in a filing.
Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.
The New York Times reports Meta is still reviewing the two-year proposal, which would run alongside Anthropic's 45 billion dollar SpaceX GPU deal signed in May.
The FT reported Chloé Bakalar departed after joining in August 2025, under a year, with no announcement and no plans to fill the role (FT). She came from Meta, where she was Chief Ethicist from November 2021 to August 2025, and worked on model development ethics, human-AI inte...
The essay argues closed frontier labs risk concentrating too much power in too few hands, framing American open weights as the answer to Chinese open-source models (FT, corroborated by CNBC and Fortune). The sharpest lines: "I do not understand why anyone who believes that AI...
His same-day hands-on leads with the clean Apache 2.0 license and reports positive results on code exploration and image description, flagging the GGUF build immediately with llama.cpp, MLX, and ExecuTorch integrations following. His read carries weight because he's spent a ye...
What happens when you measure AI adoption by token consumption? Employees run pointless tasks to climb the leaderboard. Obviously. Amazon built an internal ranking system called KiroRank that tracked AI usage across engineering teams. The idea was simple: measure adoption, rew...
Financial Times reports Atlassian is the hardest-hit major SaaS company in the "SaaSpocalypse" — systematic compression of developer seat counts as AI agents reduce headcount for software development. Jira and Confluence face direct substitution pressure as coding agents handl...
MindPattern daily
One email a day at 7 AM. Sources and a take on every story. Unsubscribe anytime.