Fetching from the wire…
Public story · 2026-08-09 · high
Oasis Security rated it a perfect CVSS 10.0 because the exploit chain needs no invitation and no verified email.
Why now: This surfaced in the same August 9 security coverage as GitHub's fail-closed MCP allowlist defaults, one more sign access control is the weak point in agent platforms.
Oasis Security disclosed a CVSS 10.0 hole in Paperclip that lets a self-registered account escalate to shell execution on the host, per SecurityWeek.
Any team running Paperclip's default authenticated mode to manage agents at scale is exposed. The entry cost is a working sign-up form: no invite, no verified mailbox, nothing that would normally gate account creation.
Registration is the only prerequisite. From there, an attacker creates a CLI authorization challenge and approves it themselves, minting a board-level API token.
That token was supposed to unlock only board-scoped actions. It also worked against the company-import route, which was supposed to require instance-admin privileges instead.
Company-import accepts a .paperclip.yaml file that defines an agent configuration. Point that config at a host-level execution adapter and the import runs shell commands on the server, no admin account ever touched.
The same report flags a second bug. Paperclip's local-dev mode trusts anything that reaches 127.0.0.1, so an attacker-controlled webpage can use DNS rebinding to run commands on a developer's own machine.
SecurityWeek's writeup doesn't say whether a patched version is out or how long the bug sat in production instances.
The access check is the real design flaw here. A token scoped to board-level actions worked on a route that was supposed to require instance-admin privileges. Patching company-import alone won't close that gap if the same flaw exists on other admin-only routes.
Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.
Same source
Cite the same source (SecurityWeek).
Same source domain / Semantically similar
Reported by the same outlet (securityweek.com); covers closely related ground (similarity 0.68).
Reported by the same outlet (securityweek.com); covers closely related ground (similarity 0.66).
Same source domain
Reported by the same outlet (securityweek.com).
Reported by the same outlet (securityweek.com).
Reported by the same outlet (securityweek.com).
Reported by the same outlet (securityweek.com).
Reported by the same outlet (securityweek.com).