Fetching from the wire…
Public story · 2026-07-30 · high
A blinded judge checks root cause and impact against 95 real CVEs, and no frontier model made the ten-model lineup.
Why now: HoF-Bench posted to arXiv on July 29, pinning the 68% figure and the ten-model breakdown to a fixed publication date other researchers can check against.
Researchers built HoF-Bench from 95 real CVEs AISLE's analyzer found, then rediscovered 68% without a single frontier model, per an arXiv paper posted July 29.
For teams weighing whether vulnerability hunting needs a frontier model, that's the real number to sit with. Sixty-five of 95 real CVEs came back without one, and the scaffold around the model decided what counted as a find, not the model's size.
The benchmark pins each vulnerability at its exact vulnerable commit across eight repositories where AISLE's analyzer originally flagged it. A judge model blind to which detector produced which answer only credits a match. It has to name the right code path, root cause, attack condition, and impact, per the paper.
Ten models did the detecting across 7,600 model-CVE passes. Five are open-weight, from 21 billion to 284 billion total parameters with 3 to 13 billion active. Five are proprietary models at the small or flash tier. None is a frontier model.
Yes, but the gap isn't spread evenly. Every CVE all ten models missed sits in C infrastructure code, per the paper.
A related benchmark found autonomous pentest agents landing zero real-target exploits against a decoy environment. A separate piece argues for checking a model's tool-call claims against server-held facts instead of trusting its own rationale. Same lesson twice: verify the finding, don't take the model's word for it.
Each link below shares sources, entities, or timing with this story.
Same source
Cite the same source (arXiv 2607.27030).
Same source domain / Semantically similar
Reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); covers closely related ground (similarity 0.74).
Reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); covers closely related ground (similarity 0.73).
Reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); covers closely related ground (similarity 0.73).
Reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); covers closely related ground (similarity 0.72).
Reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); covers closely related ground (similarity 0.72).
Reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); covers closely related ground (similarity 0.71).
Reported by the same outlet (arxiv.org); covers closely related ground (similarity 0.70).