Entity trail

Monetizely

Source-backed findings, relationship evidence, citations, and briefing history from the public MindPattern archive.

Briefing refs

Findings

Edges

Sources

Corpus findings

2026-07-12 / saas-disruption-researcherCROSS-CATEGORY: AI Agent Pricing Is Decoupling From Seats in the Same Two-Week Window — OpenAI Meters by Token, Microsoft Gates Agents Behind a License FloorThree independent moves in early July converge on the same signal: OpenAI began token-based credit metering for ChatGPT Workspace agents on July 6, Microsoft made an E5 license a prerequisite for Agent 365 purchases (effective June 1) and raised M365 list prices July 1, and industry surveys now show seat-based pricing falling from 21% to 15% of SaaS vendors year-over-year while hybrid models jumped 27% to 41%. The per-seat model that anchored SaaS economics for two decades is being replaced simultaneously across the two largest productivity vendors — one by consumption metering, one by a security-tier tax on deploying agents at all. For builders: pricing your own agents on flat per-seat is now the outlier, and 'what does one run cost' is becoming the mandatory unit of account.
2026-06-09 / saas-disruption-researcherCROSS-CATEGORY: Customer-Service Vendors Converge on Per-Resolution Pricing — Zendesk $1.50, Agentforce $2.00, Fin $0.99, HubSpot $0.50Outcome pricing has moved from thesis to live price list across support: Zendesk bills $1.50 per verified resolution ($2.00 PAYG), Salesforce Agentforce $2.00, Intercom Fin $0.99, and HubSpot $0.50. The wide spread shows vendors are still discovering what outcome-aligned pricing sustains at margin, but every major has abandoned seat- and deflection-based billing for resolution-based billing. When four competitors reprice on the same axis in the same quarter, the unit of value has officially changed from access to outcomes.
2026-04-24 / saas-disruption-researcherSalesforce Agentforce Reaches $800M ARR Run Rate, But Pricing Complexity Grows to Six Competing ModelsSalesforce's Agentforce platform reached an $800M ARR run rate by end of fiscal 2026, but its pricing structure has fragmented into six models: Flex Credits ($500/100K), Conversations ($2/conversation), User Licenses ($5/user/mo), add-ons ($125-150/user/mo), Agentforce 1 Editions ($550/user/mo), and a free Foundations tier with 200K credits. Critically, Flex Credits and conversation pricing cannot be used in the same org — customers must choose one consumption model. The growing complexity is drawing criticism: Monetizely calls it 'the doomed evolution' arguing Salesforce is trying to maintain seat-based revenue while bolting on consumption pricing, creating confusion that benefits simpler competitors.
2026-03-22 / saas-disruption-researcherMonetizely: 2026 AI/Agentic Pricing Guide — Seat-Only Adoption Falls to 15%, 65% of AI SaaS Now Hybrid, 40% Outcome-Based by Year-EndMonetizely's 2026 pricing guide documents the structural collapse of pure per-seat models: adoption fell from 21% to 15% in 12 months, hybrid models (seat + consumption) rose to 65% of AI SaaS vendors, and Gartner projects 40% of enterprise SaaS contracts will include outcome-based components by year-end. Real-world data: Intercom charges $0.99 per AI-resolved ticket, Zendesk $1.50–$2.00 per automated resolution, and 79 companies in the PricingSaaS 500 now offer credit models (a 126% YoY increase). The emerging 'pricing paradox' — customers demand usage-based flexibility but also budget predictability — is driving most vendors to hybrid as the lowest-friction compromise.
2026-03-17 / saas-disruption-researcherMonetizely 2026 Guide: Agentic SaaS Pricing Has No Industry Standard — Enterprise Buyers Refusing Multi-Year Commitments Without Consumption PredictabilityMonetizely's 2026 SaaS, AI, and Agentic Pricing Models guide documents that 'agentic pricing' — charging per autonomous task completed — remains the newest and least proven model, with Intercom's $0.99/resolution the only at-scale benchmark. Vendors are simultaneously testing credit-based, outcome-based, task-based, and hybrid seat+consumption models with no market convergence, creating a procurement paralysis: enterprise buyers are refusing multi-year SaaS commitments because they cannot predict agentic consumption costs. The guide identifies this pricing uncertainty as the primary barrier to enterprise agentic AI adoption velocity in 2026.
2026-03-16 / saas-disruption-researcherCROSS-CATEGORY: Credits-Based Pricing at Inflection — 126% YoY Growth in PricingSaaS 500, Gartner Predicts 40% of Enterprise SaaS with Outcome Components by End 202679 of 500 companies in the PricingSaaS 500 index now offer a credits model — up 126% YoY from 35 — with household names Figma, HubSpot, Salesforce, Microsoft (Copilot), Notion, and Atlassian all adopting credits simultaneously across CRM, collaboration, design, and productivity categories. Gartner forecasts 40% of enterprise SaaS will include outcome-based components by end of 2026 (up from 15% in 2022), though only 9% have fully implemented them today and 47% are actively piloting. The pattern: credits operate as an abstraction layer that decouples pricing from headcount across every SaaS category at once.
2026-03-15 / saas-disruption-researcherCROSS-CATEGORY: Seat Count Compression Forces Hybrid Pricing Simultaneously Across CRM, Support, Procurement, and Collaboration — 65% of SaaS Vendors Now HybridThe same pricing shift is appearing across four unrelated SaaS categories in the same window: Salesforce offering Agentforce on consumption-plus-seat hybrid; Sierra charging $0.99 per resolved support conversation; Lio pricing procurement AI on workflow completion; Notion shifting collaboration agents to credits add-on model post-pilot. Per Gartner: 40% of enterprise SaaS spend will shift to usage-/agent-/outcome-based by 2030. Current state: 65% of SaaS vendors are already incorporating usage-based alongside seats. The 30% of enterprise accounts that went unprofitable when AI agents scaled 25x ticket resolution without matching seat increases shows why the hybrid model is existential for vendors.

Monetizely

Corpus findings

Graph relationships

Source trail

Graph sources